When I was a child, there was a game show that adults watched with interest called, “To Tell The Truth”. The basic premise of the show consisted of a panel of four celebrities correctly identifying a contestant from a choice of three possibilities. One of the contestants normally held an unusual occupation or had done something noteworthy, and it is this person whom the panel had to attempt to identify. Two of the people will tell lies, while the real person has sworn "to tell the truth." Finally, the panel would cast a vote for the person of their choice. After the votes were cast, the famous line, “Would the real [name of the person] please stand up” would reveal the correct contestant.
Of course, what determined how good the show was dealt entirely with the individuals chosen to deceive the panel into making a wrong conclusion and ultimately the wrong choice.
The idea of deception in a game show is fun; deception in any other format is another story.
At the time of this writing, the U.S. is remembering the horrible attack upon the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. That day, nineteen Saudi men boarded aircraft under false pretense; not in identity but in purpose. They had no intention of flying to the destination punched on their tickets; their intent was to become martyrs for their faith. And their deception cost the lives of almost three thousand people.
Seven years later, when looking back at that day, what amazes me are the numbers of people that are deceived and blind to the actual events of that day. Across Europe, the Middle East and in the vast conspiracy corners of the America, millions are convinced that the attacks were staged by the United States and Israel. Even a recent New York Times article stated, “Seven years later, it remains conventional wisdom here that Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda could not have been solely responsible for the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and that the United States and Israel had to have been involved in their planning, if not their execution, too.” Who was this source of “conventional wisdom”? According to Andrew E. Kramer of the New York Times, "There was suspicion among many in the Arab world and among parts of the American public that the United States had gone to war in Iraq precisely to secure the oil wealth…”
Consider the following: In the years leading up to the invasion in Iraq, there had been no discernible oil shortage, neither had there been any production problems in almost twenty years. In early 2003, before the invasion of Iraq, the price of oil per barrel was hovering around $27.00 per barrel. Today, the price is around $105 per barrel with the highest price recently hitting almost $150 per barrel. If the U.S. was behind the 9/11 attacks for the purpose of invading Iraq to take hold of cheap oil, the plan has obviously failed.
However, consider this scenario: the Saudis whose state religion is Wahabbi jihadist Islam and sworn to destroy the U.S., Israel and other nation with like ideologies, aided in the attacks in order to…
- Eliminate the threat posed to Saudi Arabia by Saddam Hussein's Iraq
- Quadruple the price they could charge for a barrel of oil
- Direct the blame on the U.S. and Israel
Which one seems more plausible?
The Bible says that when the antichrist comes to power, he will do so under the power of deception. It is obvious that spirit is already at work in the world with so many people today at ease with the idea that their government is capable of not only committing wholesale murder and effectively covering it up. They know it’s a lie but they prefer the lie to the truth.
Former CIA Director George Tenet stated, "Of all Al-Qaida's actions…they understand that bombings by cars, trucks, trains, and planes will get them some headlines, to be sure. But if they manage to set off a mushroom cloud, they will make history.”
On this day when the words, "Never forget" ring across the airwaves, America needs to remember that it's the truth that sets us free. And if America forgets…if America deceives itself, it will have no one to blame but itself.